Today I might have found the answer to why motivation away from something (e.g. a concrete constraint) seems to work better than the motivation towards something (e.g. a vision or new idea)…
I’ve recently decided to get certified as a trainer for mimic resonance (English introduction to the concept on the MDI training website) and attend a course at the Eilert Academy. As part of my studies, I came across some findings on motivation in the context of personality types.
The section in Dirk’s book immediately reminded me of an idea, that I wrote about in my 2012 article on motivation.
What I never had really figured out, was the root cause for why one seems to be more effective than the other. Now: in his book, Dirk uses a model to describe certain personality types in the context of the attempt to decipher mimics:
Comment: My reference to the conditioning of people as preservers or thinkers is based on my experience how people act at the work place. It’s not a generalisation in terms of personality types and of course influenced by the cultural environments I’ve worked in.
Later on, Dirk then elaborates on “motivational direction” (Orig. “Motivationsausrichtung”) of the four personality types:
- Entertainers & Doers are primarily motivated TOWARDS something.
- Preservers & Thinkers are primarily motivated AWAY from something.
(Translated from source: Dirk W. Eilert, “Mimikresonanz”, p. 154)
That’s when it clicked for me…
My experience with the effectiveness of motivation and leadership might be rooted in the personality structure of most organisations.
Today’s hierarchies and operational structures have prevented the development of Entertainers (yes, we need those!) and Doers (no, we don’t have enough of them). Too many people are pushed into Preserver and Thinker roles and act accordingly.
That’s why motivation for change and progress has to point in the right direction to take effect: AWAY from challenges, hurdles, constraints and disfunction. Vision statements, promises of a bright future and the outline of “new ways of working” simply don’t resonate with the target group. At least not yet…
Do you share this finding?