Summary: If you are in charge of Digital Workplace or intranet projects I bet a lot(!) on the fact that you continuously get the “requirement” to simply launch something like Google. Then the internal search experience will be so much better. This is a short but maybe a helpful one…
If it’s getting serious…the big “G” goes Taxonomy and Refinement, too
Yes, managing taxonomies is an effort. Yes, assigning taxonomy to enterprise information makes is less easy to just “dump” stuff onto a server. No, the application of meta data to information objects cannot be fully automated (yet).
There is a substantial difference between “finding something that somewhat meets my need” (aka Web Search) or “find something specific that is required to enable me to achieve a certain (unmovable) objective” (aka Enterprise Search). That’s why 2’300’000 results and a few “media type” categories won’t hep. You need refiners/filters, which are populated from a taxonomy. So if you’re trying to find a specific “thing” Google changes your search/refine experience as well.
Here’s a little example for the search query “laptop” in Google Web and Shopping search.
You can’t just “make up” stuff in terms of meta data that you apply to products that you want to register with Google Shopping. Similar to the categorisation and description that you have to apply to offers on eBay…if you’ve ever done that you know what I am talking about.
Web Search vs. Enterprise Search: it’s about controlling the “experience of finding stuff”
I’m simply sharing a slide that I’ve created as part of my work at Infocentric. Less for advertising but more of pragmatism reasons.
Since it’s little hard to read here’s a link to a JPG.
If you need a few more reasons why taxonomies are essential to successful and user friendly (not publisher super low effort) experience:
- freedom to combine/aggregate information objects dynamically
- disconnect information from organisational/corporate structure
- ability to deliver information to the relevant user profiles (matching information object and profile meta data)
- option to associate “future” information objects (not in the system yet) to existing content via metadata
- ability to “follow” subjects instead of people (like you partly deal with Twitter, when you follow/aggregate a #tag)
Is there proof that it works?
Yes. Simply get in touch with Estée Lauder, New York. The have extracted all their assets from the search index, applied a newly designed taxonomy, moved them back into the system and now: all purple roses! Check out the Twitter minutes for #intrelEU or Social Business Collaboration 2015 where they presented that insanely awesome project!